Says who? Honestly. I've never seen that claim before. Sure, tests are timed but that's a proxy for efficiency in extrapolation.
If we define IQ in this way then LLMs far outperform any human. I'm pretty confident this would be true of even more traditional LMs.
Speed really is just the measurement of recall. A doubt we'd call someone intelligent if they memorized the multiplication table up to 100x100. Maybe at first but when we ask them for 126*8358?
If we define IQ in this way then LLMs far outperform any human. I'm pretty confident this would be true of even more traditional LMs.
Speed really is just the measurement of recall. A doubt we'd call someone intelligent if they memorized the multiplication table up to 100x100. Maybe at first but when we ask them for 126*8358?