I wonder what the false-negative rate of this algorithm is. 99% (which I assume is the true-positive rate) is certainly impressive for such a simple test, though.
It would be all kinds of awesome if this turns into something that can be done reliably and routinely!
It would be all kinds of awesome if this turns into something that can be done reliably and routinely!
Edit: seems like 99% is only for later stages of Parkinson's, and the accuracy number is just off a 50-person sample. Less impressive, but still cool. http://www.forbes.com/sites/singularity/2012/07/03/new-softw...