I don't think it's about one ideology over the other. It's about extremism of any sort that threatens to become violent. I'm not justifying or excusing it, but in my limited experience it's mostly about the bureaucratic justification of continued funding. Then the nuance becomes: 'Are these extremist movements genuine speech, or a function of foreign interference' and more often than not, it's both.
(I have no idea why the parent comment was flagged, would love an explanation for it though)
(I have no idea why the parent comment was flagged, would love an explanation for it though)