Comment

Comment by firefoxd

This morning I felt the urge to download TikTok for the first time. I did, but I didn't bother creating an account.

There is a passage in the book Life of Pi, where Pi's family is gathered and ready to leave India for Canada. And his mother does something out of the ordinary:

> The day before our departure she pointed at a cigarette wallah and earnestly asked, "Should we get a pack or two?"

> Father replied, "They have tobacco in Canada. And why do you want to buy cigarettes? We don't smoke."

> Yes, they have tobacco in Canada-but do they have Gold Flake cigarettes? Do they have Arun ice cream? Are the bicycles Heroes? Are the televisions Onidas? Are the cars Ambassadors? Are the bookshops Higginbothams'? Such, I suspect, were the questions that swirled in Mother's mind as she contemplated buying cigarettes.

Do I use TikTok? No, I've always advocated against it. Will I use it if it is reinstated? Probably not. But I downloaded it anyway the same way Mrs Gita Patel wanted to buy cigarettes. It wasn’t about need or use. It was about the loss.

I would stand behind a tiktok ban if it was for the right reasons. But this ban is only because it failed to conform to manufactured consent.

parent firefoxd 1 year ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton