Your premise is flawed because if AI is good enough to replace technical people, then it is also good enough to replace non-technical MBA types. So non-technicals don't have any skill monopoly.
You are also implying that technical is easier than non-technical, which I don't think is true.
Previously the cliche has been that a technical person can learn the non-technical skills, but that vice versa is not so true.
You are also implying that technical is easier than non-technical, which I don't think is true.
Previously the cliche has been that a technical person can learn the non-technical skills, but that vice versa is not so true.