> “We can build the architecture, the chip, the system, the libraries, and the
> algorithms all at the same time,” said Huang. “If you do that, then you can
> move faster than Moore’s Law, because you can innovate across the entire stack.”
So no connection at all with actual Moore's Law which states that number of transistors double each year. If you optimize your libraries to be 4x faster, no, that doesn't mean your 'AI chips' are improving faster than Moore's Law.
Statements like these annoy me enough to actually comment. Are they gaslighting us or do they actually believe this stuff ? Makes me really wonder.
> algorithms all at the same time,” said Huang. “If you do that, then you can
> move faster than Moore’s Law, because you can innovate across the entire stack.”
So no connection at all with actual Moore's Law which states that number of transistors double each year. If you optimize your libraries to be 4x faster, no, that doesn't mean your 'AI chips' are improving faster than Moore's Law.
Statements like these annoy me enough to actually comment. Are they gaslighting us or do they actually believe this stuff ? Makes me really wonder.