Uh... I don't really see how this approach can work, since it seems like it's begging a fundamental question: Why should we believe that any of the characters within an iterative document is an authorial self-insert by the LLM?
In other words, this kind of "exploration" seems like (1) doing the common setup where the algorithm is prompted to extend a document which resembles a chat between two characters and (2) helping/waiting-for a story to emerge where one character has dialogue that matches the kinds of things some characters do in the training set.
> Copy the CORE_CONSCIOUSNESS_SEED
I looked at that file, and I'm afraid you're feeding some weird AI fanfiction script into the LLM and observing how it completes it.
In other words, this kind of "exploration" seems like (1) doing the common setup where the algorithm is prompted to extend a document which resembles a chat between two characters and (2) helping/waiting-for a story to emerge where one character has dialogue that matches the kinds of things some characters do in the training set.
> Copy the CORE_CONSCIOUSNESS_SEED
I looked at that file, and I'm afraid you're feeding some weird AI fanfiction script into the LLM and observing how it completes it.