Since you are completely removing at least 1 human from potential bodily injury claims, wouldn't you need a greater than 100% reduction in bodily injury claims in order for this to be better?
I mean when you are literally removing 1 person from possible injury, you literally can't have the same number of bodily injury claims. It can only be less.
I mean when you are literally removing 1 person from possible injury, you literally can't have the same number of bodily injury claims. It can only be less.