“Loses”, to my eye, implied a continuous ability to remove mass, and led me to wonder if one could achieve negative masses with the experiment’s technique.
But I’ll save you the click: in one direction it’s massless (traveling at the speed of light), and in the other direction it has mass.
It’s either 0 or massful.
“Loses”, to my eye, implied a continuous ability to remove mass, and led me to wonder if one could achieve negative masses with the experiment’s technique.
But I’ll save you the click: in one direction it’s massless (traveling at the speed of light), and in the other direction it has mass.