The author dedicated more than 95% of the article to telling us that the typewriter changed Nietzsche's consciousness, but only a few sentences to vaguely describe what those changes were. And even then, what was described was more of a stylistic element, rather than a substantial one.
I would've loved to see more concrete examples of the evolution of Nietzsche's writings and ideas pre- and post-typewriter adoption, and maybe what does that mean for Nietzsche's legacy as a whole.
I would've loved to see more concrete examples of the evolution of Nietzsche's writings and ideas pre- and post-typewriter adoption, and maybe what does that mean for Nietzsche's legacy as a whole.