If you're at the point where you decided the 1000 nodes are required, you should probably have already considered the sensible alternatives first, and concluded this was somehow better.
The network saturation is just a necessary cost of running such a massive cluster.
I really have no idea what kind of system would require 1000 nodes, that couldn't be replaced by 100, 10x larger, nodes instead. And at that point, you should probably be thinking of ways to scale the network itself as well.
The network saturation is just a necessary cost of running such a massive cluster.
I really have no idea what kind of system would require 1000 nodes, that couldn't be replaced by 100, 10x larger, nodes instead. And at that point, you should probably be thinking of ways to scale the network itself as well.