I think it's fundamentally misleading, even on the central quantum stuff:
I missed what you saw, that's certainly a massive oof. It's not even wrong, in the Pauli sense, i.e. it's not just a simplistic rendering of ECC.
It also strongly tripped my internal GPT detector.
Also, it goes on and on about realtime decoding, the foundation of the article is Google's breakthrough is real time, and the Google article was quite clear that it isn't real time.*
I'm a bit confused, because it seems completely wrong, yet they published it, and there's enough phrasing that definitely doesn't trip my GPT detector. My instinct is someone who doesn't have years of background knowledge / formal comp sci & physics education made a valiant effort.
I'm reminded that my throughly /r/WSB-ified MD friend brings up "quantum computing is gonna be big what stonks should I buy" every 6 months, and a couple days ago he sent me a screenshot of my AI app that had a few conversations with him hunting for opportunities.
* "While AlphaQubit is great at accurately identifying errors, it’s still too slow to correct errors in a superconducting processor in real time"
I missed what you saw, that's certainly a massive oof. It's not even wrong, in the Pauli sense, i.e. it's not just a simplistic rendering of ECC.
It also strongly tripped my internal GPT detector.
Also, it goes on and on about realtime decoding, the foundation of the article is Google's breakthrough is real time, and the Google article was quite clear that it isn't real time.*
I'm a bit confused, because it seems completely wrong, yet they published it, and there's enough phrasing that definitely doesn't trip my GPT detector. My instinct is someone who doesn't have years of background knowledge / formal comp sci & physics education made a valiant effort.
I'm reminded that my throughly /r/WSB-ified MD friend brings up "quantum computing is gonna be big what stonks should I buy" every 6 months, and a couple days ago he sent me a screenshot of my AI app that had a few conversations with him hunting for opportunities.
* "While AlphaQubit is great at accurately identifying errors, it’s still too slow to correct errors in a superconducting processor in real time"