I'm all for giving people their chance with a good faith interpretation of their positions. But I am having trouble squaring his writings about having free and competitive ISP markets, with is his positions about reigning in tech companies.
He also complains that the FCC is a heavy-handed New Deal era agency ... but he also supports the agency nannying television and removing Section 230.
He also complains that the FCC is a heavy-handed New Deal era agency ... but he also supports the agency nannying television and removing Section 230.
You can't really have it both ways.