Comment by gruez

>It's funny to see criticism of Matt Stoller's points boil down to whataboutism.

That's not whataboutism, it's inconsistency, and it's worth pointing out.

>It's okay to be right one one thing and wrong on another.

but wouldn't you rather be right on both? "but I'm at least right on one" seems like a pretty low bar to aim for.

>It doesn't invalidate anything.

Did OP imply otherwise?