> No, literally nobody has ever wanted to be directed to "foundem", which is a scam.
Could you defend the statement that "foundem" is a scam? If it really was then that adds important context to the ruling, but I'll need something more concrete than hyperbole.
Could you defend the statement that "foundem" is a scam? If it really was then that adds important context to the ruling, but I'll need something more concrete than hyperbole.