Late to the party, but I just wanted to say how refreshing it is to see an accessibility-related post on HN that isn't about a bunch of able-bodied MIT undergrads winning awards from able-bodied judge panels for building a product that disabled people can't use to solve a problem that disabled people don't have.
There is effectively zero overlap between problems that able-bodied people think that disabled people have, and problems that disabled people actually have.
There is effectively zero overlap between problems that able-bodied people think that disabled people have, and problems that disabled people actually have.