Correct. "Selection of Benchmark Implementations" is a better name here. We'll update this in the next iteration. The point in this subsection is indeed that the selection is not adequate for comparison.
This is not the only issue, even an adequate selection of perfectly idiomatic and identical implementations would not have resulted in accurate comparison.
> C/C++ Outlier
Correct, Section 4.5.2 details this. It is 8.9x for us.
> JS/TS Outlier
The main outlier on our machine is mandelbrot, 21x (Section 4.5.1). Our second outlier is n-body (not discussed).
Correct. "Selection of Benchmark Implementations" is a better name here. We'll update this in the next iteration. The point in this subsection is indeed that the selection is not adequate for comparison. This is not the only issue, even an adequate selection of perfectly idiomatic and identical implementations would not have resulted in accurate comparison.
> C/C++ Outlier
Correct, Section 4.5.2 details this. It is 8.9x for us.
> JS/TS Outlier
The main outlier on our machine is mandelbrot, 21x (Section 4.5.1). Our second outlier is n-body (not discussed).