Source-available is great. It's not open source, but proprietary with source available is still much better than proprietary with closed source. Seeing the source makes it 100x more likely that I understand how a product works, or that I can easily work around bug until a fix is shipped.
You can argue all you want about the nomenclature and OSS side of source available, but I object strongly to the headline that it's meaningless. It's not. It's just "not open source".
You can argue all you want about the nomenclature and OSS side of source available, but I object strongly to the headline that it's meaningless. It's not. It's just "not open source".