* We're seeing much less of "it's making mistakes" these days.*
Perhaps less than before, but still making very fundamental errors. Anything involving number I'm automatically suspicious. Pretty frequently I'd get different answers for the same question (to a human).
e.g. ChatGPT will give an effective tax rate of n for some income amount. Then when asked to break down the calculation will come up with an effective tax rate of m instead. When asked how much tax is owed on that income will come up with a different number such that the effective rate is not n or m.
Until this is addressed to a sufficient degree, it seems difficult to apply to anything that involves numbers and can't be quickly verified by a human.
Perhaps less than before, but still making very fundamental errors. Anything involving number I'm automatically suspicious. Pretty frequently I'd get different answers for the same question (to a human).
e.g. ChatGPT will give an effective tax rate of n for some income amount. Then when asked to break down the calculation will come up with an effective tax rate of m instead. When asked how much tax is owed on that income will come up with a different number such that the effective rate is not n or m.
Until this is addressed to a sufficient degree, it seems difficult to apply to anything that involves numbers and can't be quickly verified by a human.