The primary benefit of FOSS is the ability to inspect and patch the software yourself. Another important benefit for any large FOSS project is knowing it’s been heavily reviewed.
Protocol compatibility is a baseline requirement for a drop-in replacement. Without that, your product would need to be like 10x cheaper than Prometheus for anyone to consider devoting engineering resources to switching to it.
Existing FOSS solutions are reliable and inexpensive enough, not even considering the effort and unknowns involved with swapping out a major component of the observatory stack. Between that, your distorted view of open source, and your focus on checkbox compliance, I’m unlikely to ever consider trying your software. I wish you luck though, and I hope you learn more about the value of FOSS.
Protocol compatibility is a baseline requirement for a drop-in replacement. Without that, your product would need to be like 10x cheaper than Prometheus for anyone to consider devoting engineering resources to switching to it.
Existing FOSS solutions are reliable and inexpensive enough, not even considering the effort and unknowns involved with swapping out a major component of the observatory stack. Between that, your distorted view of open source, and your focus on checkbox compliance, I’m unlikely to ever consider trying your software. I wish you luck though, and I hope you learn more about the value of FOSS.