This is a slanted version of the facts surrounding the case. A laptop belonging to the victim was sold by Williams to another man; how did he get it? Both the girlfriend and the cell mate testified that he admitted to the crime; that the cell mate had details about the crime that were not known to the public, etc.
The DNA evidence was never the main thrust of the case.
FWIW I am against the death penalty since it gives too much power to the state. But slanting the news is not a good way forward.
The DNA evidence was never the main thrust of the case.
FWIW I am against the death penalty since it gives too much power to the state. But slanting the news is not a good way forward.