I have a few ideas in the works for accepting contributions that I will iron out in the coming days. I have some breaking changes in the works to make the journal more reliable and testable. The current implementation requires deep understanding of my vision.
AFAIK, North Korea, Russia, and United States, all have the same five accounts types and require double-entry.
This truly is a mission to rebuild an institution. My goal is to educate a new generation of accountants. The kind who can produce any report from raw journal entries and who can add new features to the journal.
Parent-child relationships help with reporting, but I notice the need to include parent-child relationships almost everywhere; locations, items (products/services), chart-of-accounts, users, tasks, etc.
I've not touched reporting because I know it will be easy to do.
If I get the journal, accounts, and transactions right, the rest is easy street.
One thing to mention at this time is that I don't see a need to manually enter journal entries. I'm ready to catch flack for saying this, but maybe... idk. Still in R&D phase.
AFAIK, North Korea, Russia, and United States, all have the same five accounts types and require double-entry.
This truly is a mission to rebuild an institution. My goal is to educate a new generation of accountants. The kind who can produce any report from raw journal entries and who can add new features to the journal.
Parent-child relationships help with reporting, but I notice the need to include parent-child relationships almost everywhere; locations, items (products/services), chart-of-accounts, users, tasks, etc.
I've not touched reporting because I know it will be easy to do.
If I get the journal, accounts, and transactions right, the rest is easy street.
One thing to mention at this time is that I don't see a need to manually enter journal entries. I'm ready to catch flack for saying this, but maybe... idk. Still in R&D phase.