No mention of Holly Herndon or Mat Dryhurst at all? Whoever wrote this completely failed to do their research — more than anyone else I'm aware of, they've been working to explore the possibilities of how working with AI can be considered Art.
EDIT: didn't mention Archillect either. Extremely low value article.
EDIT2: finished reading, and no mention at all about Section 230 protections despite discussing "tech platforms", and a single reference to "fair use" being referenced in a callout box. Whoever wrote this should be embarassed by how little they say with so many words.
Some assorted reading:
- https://x.com/matdryhurst/status/1830554355025477940
- https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/11/20/holly-herndons...
- https://www.anothermag.com/art-photography/15858/art-in-the-...
EDIT: didn't mention Archillect either. Extremely low value article.
EDIT2: finished reading, and no mention at all about Section 230 protections despite discussing "tech platforms", and a single reference to "fair use" being referenced in a callout box. Whoever wrote this should be embarassed by how little they say with so many words.