Seriously. I actually feel as impressed by the chain of thought, as I was when ChatGPT first came out.
This isn't "just" autocompletion anymore, this is actual step-by-step reasoning full of ideas and dead ends and refinement, just like humans do when solving problems. Even if it is still ultimately being powered by "autocompletion".
But then it makes me wonder about human reasoning, and what if it's similar? Just following basic patterns of "thinking steps" that ultimately aren't any different from "English language grammar steps"?
This is truly making me wonder if LLM's are actually far more powerful than we thought at first, and if it's just a matter of figuring out how to plug them together in the right configurations, like "making them think".
This isn't "just" autocompletion anymore, this is actual step-by-step reasoning full of ideas and dead ends and refinement, just like humans do when solving problems. Even if it is still ultimately being powered by "autocompletion".
But then it makes me wonder about human reasoning, and what if it's similar? Just following basic patterns of "thinking steps" that ultimately aren't any different from "English language grammar steps"?
This is truly making me wonder if LLM's are actually far more powerful than we thought at first, and if it's just a matter of figuring out how to plug them together in the right configurations, like "making them think".