When you offer a subset of the product as open, and a subset as not open, its not open source. Pretty simple math for me.
This is not a comment on "which" OSI license they used for the open part, but I will not support people calling Open Core broadly Open Source, as its not.
This is not a comment on "which" OSI license they used for the open part, but I will not support people calling Open Core broadly Open Source, as its not.