Those of us who aren't Adobe salespeople have less incentive to care about keeping feature parity with a predatory cloud-subscription-pushing entity.
Some of us see decadence driving many features on mature graphics applications, coupled with rentseeking on 30 year old code.
If it's NOT 30 year old code, why is it seeking to replace funcioning code?
Rentseeking.
I find GIMP satisfactory for my remaining raster graphic needs.
I prefer vector graphics applications for anything that is not a photograph...
Some of us see decadence driving many features on mature graphics applications, coupled with rentseeking on 30 year old code. If it's NOT 30 year old code, why is it seeking to replace funcioning code? Rentseeking.
I find GIMP satisfactory for my remaining raster graphic needs. I prefer vector graphics applications for anything that is not a photograph...