Right. The headline was edited to fit HN length limits with the unfortunate effect of making a decade-old action appear to be current. I'd suggest dropping "Advantage" which reduces specificity but doesn't mislead to the same extent.
My own practice is to note headline edits in a submission comment, whether for length, clarity, removing clickbait / outrage, etc.
And the fact that the past nature of the event is immediately clear in the first 'graph of TFA strongly encourages the act of R'ing TFA, rather than reacting blindly to headlines.
(I've emailed mods suggesting an improved title of: "Feds Killed Plan to Curb Medicare Overbilling After Industry Opposition in 2014".)
My own practice is to note headline edits in a submission comment, whether for length, clarity, removing clickbait / outrage, etc.
And the fact that the past nature of the event is immediately clear in the first 'graph of TFA strongly encourages the act of R'ing TFA, rather than reacting blindly to headlines.
(I've emailed mods suggesting an improved title of: "Feds Killed Plan to Curb Medicare Overbilling After Industry Opposition in 2014".)