Seems like this doesn't solve the problem, it just changes the nature of the problem from a link rot to having a single point of failure.
What assurances does perma cc give that it will continue to maintain its index for the foreseeable future as costs increase? Wayback machine is maintained by a non-profit with a charter and >$30m in annual donations/revenues. As far as I can tell Perma is maintained by a single entity (Harvard Law Library)
Not trying to be negative here but genuinely don't see how a SPOF is better than link rot.
What assurances does perma cc give that it will continue to maintain its index for the foreseeable future as costs increase? Wayback machine is maintained by a non-profit with a charter and >$30m in annual donations/revenues. As far as I can tell Perma is maintained by a single entity (Harvard Law Library)
Not trying to be negative here but genuinely don't see how a SPOF is better than link rot.