Well I think it's neat. The bit I find most provoking is the "if you already have Kubernetes..." premise. I find myself having a hard time not wanting to shove everything into the Kubernetes framework simply to avoid having to document what solutions I've chosen. `kubectl get all` gives me an overview of a project in a way that is impossible if every single project uses a different or bespoke management system.
"simple/complex" is not the right paradigm. The real SRE controversy is "unique/standard". Yes, the standard approach is more complex. But it is better _in practice_ to have a single approach, rather than many individually-simpler, but in-aggregate-more-complex approaches.
Kubernetes is never the perfect solution to an engineering problem, but it is almost always the most pragmatic solution to a business problem for a business with many such problems.
"simple/complex" is not the right paradigm. The real SRE controversy is "unique/standard". Yes, the standard approach is more complex. But it is better _in practice_ to have a single approach, rather than many individually-simpler, but in-aggregate-more-complex approaches.
Kubernetes is never the perfect solution to an engineering problem, but it is almost always the most pragmatic solution to a business problem for a business with many such problems.