If the agreement at the time is anything like the current agreement, this is a serious misrepresentation to the court.
The terms do require Disney+ users to "agree to resolve, by binding individual arbitration as provided below, all Disputes" with some IP exceptions.
But "Disputes" is a term of art that "includes any claim, dispute, action, or other controversy, whether based on past, present, or future events, whether based in contract, tort, statute, or common law, between you and Disney concerning the Disney Products or this Agreement" (emphasis added).
What are the Disney Products? They are "certain websites, software, applications, content, products, and services in any media format or channel."
I hope the lawyers get sanctioned and disbarred.
The terms do require Disney+ users to "agree to resolve, by binding individual arbitration as provided below, all Disputes" with some IP exceptions.
But "Disputes" is a term of art that "includes any claim, dispute, action, or other controversy, whether based on past, present, or future events, whether based in contract, tort, statute, or common law, between you and Disney concerning the Disney Products or this Agreement" (emphasis added).
What are the Disney Products? They are "certain websites, software, applications, content, products, and services in any media format or channel."
I hope the lawyers get sanctioned and disbarred.