But OpenAI said LLMs can't innovate until human-level reasoning and long-term agenthood is solved. [1] Referring to their precious 5 stages to classify AI before it reaches the scary "beyond" levels of intelligence... presumably at that point they get the feds involved to reg cap the field, so genuine is the fear of the pace they've set.
It's clear OpenAI is a hype company knocking over glass bottle stacks at its own wonderful carnival stall. Obviously if you can reason you can reason about what is innovative and we don't need OpenAI to set up fake scary progress markers like an Automated Scientific Organization.
Lets see if scientists even want this style of tech progress, it'd be sad to see each multitudes of AI papers having to be rebuilt from scratch and flushed down the toilet because associating with it is taboo.
It's clear OpenAI is a hype company knocking over glass bottle stacks at its own wonderful carnival stall. Obviously if you can reason you can reason about what is innovative and we don't need OpenAI to set up fake scary progress markers like an Automated Scientific Organization.
Lets see if scientists even want this style of tech progress, it'd be sad to see each multitudes of AI papers having to be rebuilt from scratch and flushed down the toilet because associating with it is taboo.
[1]: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/07/opena...