It’s a nice toy, and appreciate the simple interface and not storing PII (ie, requiring name, address, …). But this seems like yet another calendar to me that I need to manage with _every_ relationship. Maybe I want to share a calendar with my SO, but what about my friend on the other side of town?
N+1 calendars I have to manage.
I would like to use my preferred calendar app and sync events I share to other people via CalDAV protocol.
It’s a standard protocol that’s existed for a long time now. [1,2]
Scheduling can be a bit janky especially with remote servers (ie, outlook…). But for the most part it works. Enter e-mail of person I want to share event with and person can see it in their preferred calendar.
Even updates work pretty well. It’s a shame we have all of these protocols but nobody bothers to use them and prefer their proprietary shit (ie, discord, telegram, signal, fb, ig, …)
Why must we continue to write “solutions” for already solved problems?
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CalDAV
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4791
N+1 calendars I have to manage.
I would like to use my preferred calendar app and sync events I share to other people via CalDAV protocol.
It’s a standard protocol that’s existed for a long time now. [1,2]
Scheduling can be a bit janky especially with remote servers (ie, outlook…). But for the most part it works. Enter e-mail of person I want to share event with and person can see it in their preferred calendar.
Even updates work pretty well. It’s a shame we have all of these protocols but nobody bothers to use them and prefer their proprietary shit (ie, discord, telegram, signal, fb, ig, …)
Why must we continue to write “solutions” for already solved problems?
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CalDAV
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4791