Sorry, something was probably lost in interpretation. You wrote:
> RTO for giants is a must because they die without the office.
Are you referring to tech giants here? That's what the thread was about I believe (interviewing for tech roles, at least). Just to make sure - you are not including Starbucks here.
> Offices are the last meaningful /.../ [stuff that I probably agree with] /.../
> Essentially if we WFH for all eligible jobs we re-create a SMEs economy killing the giants
This is what sounded like conspiracy to me. Would RTO due to "saving Starbucks" really be an argument line that Apple pursues?
> RTO for giants is a must because they die without the office.
Are you referring to tech giants here? That's what the thread was about I believe (interviewing for tech roles, at least). Just to make sure - you are not including Starbucks here.
> Offices are the last meaningful /.../ [stuff that I probably agree with] /.../
> Essentially if we WFH for all eligible jobs we re-create a SMEs economy killing the giants
This is what sounded like conspiracy to me. Would RTO due to "saving Starbucks" really be an argument line that Apple pursues?