Could you help me understand what you are suggesting is done instead?
To me, it seems like you're suggesting that vulnerabilities are just left in play until someone malicious comes along and decides to do some real damage. But that seems so silly that I must be missing some alternative that you're thinking about.
To me, it seems like you're suggesting that vulnerabilities are just left in play until someone malicious comes along and decides to do some real damage. But that seems so silly that I must be missing some alternative that you're thinking about.