Thanks. My initial reaction upon reading the submitted title was dismissive because I dislike when companies mimic the prestige of open source by saying "source available" while having a practically proprietary license.
This is the first time I've seen FSL and it is quite nice. Surely "source available" is the wrong term to label the license with.
This is the first time I've seen FSL and it is quite nice. Surely "source available" is the wrong term to label the license with.