That's precisely why I love to only comment things with questions, i.e. "isn't go-to considered harmful? Is this really the best way?".
It gives the person making the change the opportunity to give context for their decision - and either change or spell out their reasoning for it, potentially giving me an opportunity to learn from them.
Another good benefit is that it doesn't "attack" the PR author in the "non-violent communication" way
It gives the person making the change the opportunity to give context for their decision - and either change or spell out their reasoning for it, potentially giving me an opportunity to learn from them.
Another good benefit is that it doesn't "attack" the PR author in the "non-violent communication" way