> If the treatment is expensive, then only net-productive individuals would be able to afford it, meaning we would gain the benefit of contributors contributing for longer, without net-recipients receiving for longer.
Because rich people are "net-productive" and poor people are "net-recipients"?
This is wrong on so many levels. And even today rich people live on average longer. Can't see the benefit myself.
Because rich people are "net-productive" and poor people are "net-recipients"?
This is wrong on so many levels. And even today rich people live on average longer. Can't see the benefit myself.