You're the second person to link the exact same paper I did in my first response.
> To your original point, the title of this paper is only using terms ("paramorphisms", "recursive", and "program synthesis") that are decidedly not novel.
They italicize paramorphism in the abstract. We all very well know that italics means novel usage. So again: let's drop the charade that everything is above board here.
You're the second person to link the exact same paper I did in my first response.
> To your original point, the title of this paper is only using terms ("paramorphisms", "recursive", and "program synthesis") that are decidedly not novel.
They italicize paramorphism in the abstract. We all very well know that italics means novel usage. So again: let's drop the charade that everything is above board here.