These types of takes seem pretty ignorant of the percentage of workers and students that are using artificial intelligence tools daily.
It is ignorant because it ignores any economical improvement that comes from say a machinist figuring out gcode issues, a culinary student learning safer fermentation etc...
This is pretty typical of finance or public relations people trying to make their thinking easier by only focusing on one variable at a time.
Don't know exact data, but can referr to Peter Diamantis quote:
```A survey by Microsoft and LinkedIn revealed that 85% of Gen Z uses AI at work, followed by Millennials at 78%, Gen X at 76%, and Boomers at 73%.```
Whether you want to believe thator not, you can think for yourself on how getting chatGPT to successfuly fix your espresso machine by telling which $0.35 gasket to replace... has had a positive growing booming impact on the economy or not.
To me it looks like it has and will continue to do so despite the venture money laundering/border-line-fraud issues that are clouding the picture
It is ignorant because it ignores any economical improvement that comes from say a machinist figuring out gcode issues, a culinary student learning safer fermentation etc...
This is pretty typical of finance or public relations people trying to make their thinking easier by only focusing on one variable at a time.
Don't know exact data, but can referr to Peter Diamantis quote:
```A survey by Microsoft and LinkedIn revealed that 85% of Gen Z uses AI at work, followed by Millennials at 78%, Gen X at 76%, and Boomers at 73%.```
Whether you want to believe thator not, you can think for yourself on how getting chatGPT to successfuly fix your espresso machine by telling which $0.35 gasket to replace... has had a positive growing booming impact on the economy or not.
To me it looks like it has and will continue to do so despite the venture money laundering/border-line-fraud issues that are clouding the picture