Is this a case of perfect being the enemy of good?
I don't know anything about the legislation, but the linked article's main complaint seems to be that anti discrimination language was removed from the bill. Ok. I don't understand all the issues involved with that, or what that language was.
Regardless, is it still good without that? Does it increase our privacy rights? Why not move the needle in the right direction and then lobby for additional things?
I don't know anything about the legislation, but the linked article's main complaint seems to be that anti discrimination language was removed from the bill. Ok. I don't understand all the issues involved with that, or what that language was.
Regardless, is it still good without that? Does it increase our privacy rights? Why not move the needle in the right direction and then lobby for additional things?