One's default when seeing a claim to do better than the Shannon limit is to guess that the author is a scammer, confused, or both.
My impression in a quick read of this github page is that this person has no background in channel coding or information theory. Maybe not quite a scammer, but it appears this should be ignored.
My impression in a quick read of this github page is that this person has no background in channel coding or information theory. Maybe not quite a scammer, but it appears this should be ignored.