The problem is that the EPA report doesn't say what she says it does.
1. Apple doesn't do chip fab at Scott Blvd. They did R&D for Titan and microLED screens and were part of the layoffs in April.
2. The EPA says that they didn't have permits WITH THE EPA, but were permitted with California and Santa Clara County/City.
3. She says the carbon filters weren't changed, not the EPA.
4. She says Apple said materials weren't hazardous waste, but the report says they were labeled "California Waste", meaning they weren't properly reporting the materials to the EPA, but were to the state of California.
5. How is it this woman was nearly killed, while the employees who WORK in the building are perfectly healthy, the next door businesses have no sick employees, and the other thousands of residents in the apartment building are also not sick?
6. Why isn't the news covering this? Why aren't they shut down?
None of this makes any sense and looking at her lawsuit, she seems like she needs to serious mental help.
1. Apple doesn't do chip fab at Scott Blvd. They did R&D for Titan and microLED screens and were part of the layoffs in April.
2. The EPA says that they didn't have permits WITH THE EPA, but were permitted with California and Santa Clara County/City.
3. She says the carbon filters weren't changed, not the EPA.
4. She says Apple said materials weren't hazardous waste, but the report says they were labeled "California Waste", meaning they weren't properly reporting the materials to the EPA, but were to the state of California.
5. How is it this woman was nearly killed, while the employees who WORK in the building are perfectly healthy, the next door businesses have no sick employees, and the other thousands of residents in the apartment building are also not sick?
6. Why isn't the news covering this? Why aren't they shut down?
None of this makes any sense and looking at her lawsuit, she seems like she needs to serious mental help.