> does it mean they will only propose when they have chance to pass?
This is typically how legislative bodies work--it's why vote counting is an essential component of whipping. (Sorry, American political terminology.)
> It has no chance to be rejected and gone for good?
I have never seen a way to do this proposed that doesn't have horrific side effects. (One, who decides which issues are too similar to previously-mooted ones. Two, how do you avoid one side deliberately "spoiling" an issue to prevent the other from taking action on it in the future.)
The best you can do is require a total process re-start each time. That doesn't prevent reintroduction, but it adds significant cost and delay.
This is typically how legislative bodies work--it's why vote counting is an essential component of whipping. (Sorry, American political terminology.)
> It has no chance to be rejected and gone for good?
I have never seen a way to do this proposed that doesn't have horrific side effects. (One, who decides which issues are too similar to previously-mooted ones. Two, how do you avoid one side deliberately "spoiling" an issue to prevent the other from taking action on it in the future.)
The best you can do is require a total process re-start each time. That doesn't prevent reintroduction, but it adds significant cost and delay.