It doesn't sound like there's any dispute about what happened.
Woah, hold on just a minute there!
The only reason there is no dispute is because we're getting the story 100% from one side. I don't know either of these people involved and I suspect none of the commenters here do either. There are several possible narratives that fit this story:
* "Sleazy dude attacks woman"
* "Clash of cultures; open-marriage dude meets conservative girl"
* "Crazy bitch made it all up"
A couple days ago there was a HN story about WhosHere suing WhosNearMe and the
thread was full of "we need to hear the other side before rushing to judgement". This insight seems to have been lost here.
Woah, hold on just a minute there!
The only reason there is no dispute is because we're getting the story 100% from one side. I don't know either of these people involved and I suspect none of the commenters here do either. There are several possible narratives that fit this story:
* "Sleazy dude attacks woman"
* "Clash of cultures; open-marriage dude meets conservative girl"
* "Crazy bitch made it all up"
A couple days ago there was a HN story about WhosHere suing WhosNearMe and the thread was full of "we need to hear the other side before rushing to judgement". This insight seems to have been lost here.