To be fair, people did this before ChatGPT. It's just the thing they point to as evidence now, and they'll always find something. The underlying problem is much bigger:
1) people confidently arguing with domain experts about topics that they have little to no experience in.
2) people valuing the opinions of arguers from 1 over experts.
1) people confidently arguing with domain experts about topics that they have little to no experience in.
2) people valuing the opinions of arguers from 1 over experts.