I guess what I'm wondering is more about the opposite of the "cool/neat" where orgs either prohibit development in non-standard langs (and that was good/bad) or allow development in non-standard langs (and that was good/bad).
What criteria is used to determine when it's ok to deviate from in-house langs? What justification is used to prevent deviation at all costs?
What criteria is used to determine when it's ok to deviate from in-house langs? What justification is used to prevent deviation at all costs?