A basic problem with evaluations like these is that the test is designed to discriminate between humans who would make good lawyers and humans who would not make good lawyers. The test is not necessarily any good at telling whether a non-human would make a good lawyer, since it will not test anything that pretty much all humans know, but non-humans may not.
For example, I doubt that it asks whether, for a person of average wealth and income, a $1000 fine is a more or less severe punishment than a month in jail.
For example, I doubt that it asks whether, for a person of average wealth and income, a $1000 fine is a more or less severe punishment than a month in jail.