So, not a physicist, but the claims in the PDF about how GR has "never predicted a single galaxy rotation curve" are overblown, right? Aren't there a handful of galaxies where the rotation curve lines up pretty close with the predictions from the visible mass? Any new physics has to explain those, too.
Anyway, I think I can see why QI is so appealing. The paper contains a very short and sweet explanation.
Anyway, I think I can see why QI is so appealing. The paper contains a very short and sweet explanation.