It's funny to watch how often new programming languages resemble visually (and conceptually) the language they are written in. You can put it the other way: just look at a syntax sample and try to guess the implementation language.
I can see some problem here. Probably, it means the author is under heavy influence of the implementation language, that limits their thinking and creativity scope to the concepts of that language.
I can see some problem here. Probably, it means the author is under heavy influence of the implementation language, that limits their thinking and creativity scope to the concepts of that language.