In one paragraph the politicians claim it is about protecting children. Their supporting evidence is that 40% of college age women report being choked during sex. The implication is that by banning minors from watching porn it will protect college age women.
There are so many issues with this reasoning. The most obvious is that the legislation wouldn’t ban college age men/women from watching porn.
If this law is really about “protecting children” then why are they banning all porn and not just the particular violent videos they object to?
There are so many issues with this reasoning. The most obvious is that the legislation wouldn’t ban college age men/women from watching porn.
If this law is really about “protecting children” then why are they banning all porn and not just the particular violent videos they object to?